Skip to content Skip to footer Review: Why it doesn’t work and is absolutely useless

Looking for a reliable tool to check for plagiarism, grammar errors, and receive writing suggestions? claims to offer all these features, but does it really deliver? In this review, we will explore how works, its key features such as the plagiarism checker, grammar checker, and writing suggestions. We will also discuss why falls short in terms of accuracy and effectiveness, and suggest alternative tools like Grammarly, Copyscape, and Quetext. Is worth the cost? Let’s find out.


Key Takeaways:

  • may claim to be a useful tool, but it falls short in delivering accurate plagiarism detection, limited grammar checking, and poor writing suggestions.
  • When it comes to checking for plagiarism and improving writing skills, there are better alternatives to such as Grammarly, Copyscape, and Quetext.
  • Save your time and money by avoiding, as it is not effective and there are better options available for improving your writing and avoiding plagiarism.

What is is an AI-powered content detection tool designed to help writers, publishers, and academic professionals identify and prevent plagiarism in AI-generated and human-written content.

This innovative tool leverages advanced AI detection algorithms to meticulously scan texts and compare them against a vast database of sources, ensuring unparalleled accuracy in detecting instances of plagiarism. Catering to a diverse range of users, from students and researchers to content creators and editors, revolutionizes the way plagiarism is detected and eradicated. By providing real-time feedback and comprehensive reports, it enables users to uphold academic integrity, safeguard intellectual property, and maintain credibility in their work.

How Does Claim to Work? leverages advanced AI technologies such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT to scan and analyze written content, providing accurate detection of plagiarism and ensuring the originality of text generated using these writing tools.

By utilizing the strength of GPT-4, achieves a high level of accuracy in identifying similarities in texts, making it a robust AI detection and writing tool.

ChatGPT, with its natural language processing capabilities, complements this process by enhancing the contextual understanding of the content being scanned.

The integration of these AI models allows for a comprehensive plagiarism scanning mechanism that goes beyond mere word-to-word comparisons and scrutinizes content at a deeper semantic level.

What Are the Features of boasts a range of features, including high accuracy in plagiarism detection for both human and AI-generated content, making it a valuable tool for web publishers, writers, and academic professionals.

Its ability to identify unoriginal content with precision caters to the diverse needs of users across various industries. The platform offers a seamless experience, ensuring that individuals can trust the authenticity of their work. For web publishers, this means safeguarding their online reputation and maintaining originality standards. In the case of writers, it aids in protecting their intellectual property and upholding ethical writing practices. Academic professionals benefit from the meticulous scrutiny provided by, enabling them to maintain the integrity of scholarly works.

Plagiarism Checker

The plagiarism checker in offers a user-friendly interface and utilizes cutting-edge technologies like GPT-3 for accurate detection, along with providing readability scores based on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level.

With the plagiarism scanning feature, users can simply upload their content and let the system do the rest, swiftly identifying any instances of plagiarism. The UI is designed to be intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate through the results effortlessly.

What sets apart is its integration with GPT-3, enabling advanced detection capabilities that go beyond traditional methods. This integration ensures not only accuracy in identifying copied content but also provides users with deeper insights into the originality of their text.

Grammar Checker’s grammar checker not only performs comprehensive scans across full websites and content repositories but also offers insights into AI-generated content and readability scores, seamlessly integrated into the Chrome extension.

Imagine effortlessly receiving detailed reports on the grammar and originality of your content with just a few clicks. Full Site Scans provided by make it a breeze to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of your digital presence. The ability to analyze AI-generated content ensures that your automated text maintains quality and coherence. With the Chrome extension, accessing these powerful features becomes quick and convenient, allowing you to enhance your writing with ease.

Writing Suggestions offers writing suggestions tailored to different pricing plans, including a Monthly Subscription Plan with Team Management features and API access for seamless integration with existing workflows.

With the various pricing options available, users can select a plan that best suits their needs and budget. The Monthly Subscription Plan not only provides access to innovative writing suggestions but also offers Team Management capabilities, allowing multiple team members to collaborate efficiently.

The convenience of API access elevates the usability of the platform, making it easier for businesses to integrate writing suggestions into their existing processes and systems.

Why is Not Effective?

Despite its advanced capabilities, may encounter limitations such as false positives and negatives, which can be attributed to factors like the performance of GPT-3.5 and alternative tools like

While boasts impressive features, its reliance on GPT-3.5 can lead to instances where the generated content may not entirely align with the user’s intent, resulting in false positives or inaccuracies.

The competitive landscape with tools like raises concerns about the platform’s ability to consistently deliver top-notch results compared to its counterparts.

These drawbacks could potentially hinder the seamless user experience that organizations seek when utilizing AI-powered writing assistance tools.

Inaccurate Plagiarism Detection

One of the primary reasons for’s ineffective performance is the presence of inaccuracies in plagiarism detection, prompting the need for further enhancements by the product developers and editor teams.

Improving the accuracy of plagiarism detection is crucial in ensuring the credibility and reliability of the tool. Product developers can consider implementing advanced algorithms that can better identify similarities in text, enhancing the overall detection process. Enhancing the database’s scope and regularly updating it with the latest sources can significantly improve the tool’s efficiency. Collaborations with academic institutions and content experts can also provide valuable insights for refining the detection mechanisms.

Limited Grammar Checking

The limited capabilities of in grammar checking, especially for publishers utilizing the Chrome Extension, may stem from challenges related to analyzing AI-generated content and integrating external API key functionalities.

One key constraint faced by is the intricacy involved in comprehensively evaluating the nuances of language syntax and semantics that AI-generated content presents. This complexity often leads to difficulties in accurately identifying and rectifying grammatical errors, particularly within the context of content produced through the Chrome Extension.

Ensuring seamless integration of external API keys is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of grammar checking algorithms. The successful incorporation of API key functionalities is vital for enabling the software to access additional resources and data required for more accurate and contextually appropriate grammar suggestions.

Poor Writing Suggestions’s writing suggestions feature may fall short in effectiveness due to issues with Team Management functionalities, auto billing inaccuracies, and limited access to comprehensive scan histories affecting user experience and pricing considerations.

Team Management functionalities play a crucial role in ensuring streamlined collaboration within writing teams, but the lack of robust tools in could lead to inefficiencies and miscommunication among team members.

The auto billing inaccuracies pose a significant challenge as users may face unexpected charges or discrepancies in their billing statements, causing frustration and eroding trust in the platform.

The limited access to a detailed scan history hinders users from tracking their writing progress effectively, making it difficult to identify areas for improvement and measure the impact of the suggestions provided.

What Are the Alternatives to

For those seeking alternatives to, popular options include Grammarly, Copyscape, and Quetext, catering to the needs of teachers, students, and organizations requiring reliable content detection tools.

Grammarly, known for its robust grammar checking features, helps teachers ensure the correctness of academic papers and aids students in improving their writing skills. Similarly, Copyscape offers plagiarism detection services, essential for educators to verify the originality of student submissions and prevent unintentional plagiarism.

On the other hand, Quetext provides a user-friendly interface and thorough plagiarism scanning, making it ideal for both teachers creating lesson plans and students working on research projects. These platforms play a crucial role in fostering a culture of academic integrity and enhancing the quality of educational content.


Grammarly stands out as a prominent alternative to, offering advanced readability analysis, pricing flexibility, and accurate readability scores for users seeking comprehensive writing assistance.

One of the key features that sets Grammarly apart from other writing tools is its robust readability analysis. It not only highlights complex sentences but also provides suggestions to improve overall readability, making your content more engaging and accessible to a wider audience.

In terms of pricing, Grammarly offers various subscription options, catering to different budget preferences. Whether you’re a student, professional, or enterprise user, you can find a plan that suits your needs without compromising on quality.

The tool’s ability to provide accurate readability scores enables writers to gauge the readability level of their content instantly. This feature helps users tailor their writing style to ensure it resonates well with their target audience, enhancing the effectiveness of their message.


Copyscape emerges as a viable choice for users looking beyond, offering a user-friendly interface, Pay-as-You-Go Plans, and specialized Content Detector tools for effective plagiarism prevention.

Its user interface is sleek and intuitive, making it easy for individuals to navigate through the platform effortlessly. Copyscape’s flexible Pay-as-You-Go Plans cater to varying needs and budgets, allowing users to only pay for what they use.

The specialized Content Detector tools offered by Copyscape are specifically crafted to efficiently identify any traces of plagiarism in written content, ensuring that users can trust the authenticity of their work. This feature sets it apart in the realm of online plagiarism checkers, providing a comprehensive solution for content creators and businesses looking to maintain the originality of their materials.


Quetext presents itself as a reliable substitute for, excelling in human-written and AI-generated content detection, along with robust plagiarism scanning capabilities tailored to user needs.

One of the standout strengths of Quetext lies in its AI detection capabilities, which distinguish between authentic human work and content generated by artificial intelligence.

  • Its advanced algorithms ensure thorough plagiarism scanning to provide users with accurate results.
  • This comprehensive approach makes Quetext a valuable tool for students, writers, researchers, and professionals seeking to maintain the integrity of their work.

Is Worth the Cost?

Assessing the value proposition of involves considering factors such as pricing plans, website accessibility, team collaboration features, user feedback, and the overall impact on content integrity and user satisfaction.

One of the key aspects when determining the pricing structure is the ability to find a plan that fits your needs and budget. The flexibility of payment options can make a significant difference for businesses of all sizes.

Exploring the features offered by can reveal unique tools that enhance teamwork and streamline content creation processes. User testimonials play a vital role in understanding the software’s practical benefits, while also shedding light on any potential drawbacks.

Ultimately, the focus remains on how contributes to maintaining high standards of content authenticity and ensuring a positive user experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is and why is it receiving negative reviews? is a software designed to detect plagiarism in written content. However, many users have reported that it does not work as promised and is ultimately useless in its intended purpose.

How does work? uses algorithms and databases to compare submitted content to existing content on the internet. It then generates a report indicating the percentage of similarity between the two.

Why do people say doesn’t work?

Users have reported numerous issues with, such as inaccurate results, inability to detect plagiarism, and technical glitches. These shortcomings make it unreliable and ineffective in detecting plagiarism.

Is a reliable tool for academic or professional use?

Due to its unreliability and inaccuracies, is not recommended for use in academic or professional settings where accurate plagiarism detection is crucial.

Are there any alternative plagiarism detection tools that are more effective?

Yes, there are several other plagiarism detection tools available that have received better reviews and are more reliable than Some popular alternatives include Turnitin, Copyscape, and Grammarly.

Is there any benefit to using despite its flaws?

Unfortunately, no. The unreliability and ineffectiveness of make it a waste of time and resources, with no real benefit to using it. It is best to explore other options for plagiarism detection.