Skip to content Skip to footer

Universities Must Adapt to ChatGPT Surge or Fall Behind

Universities are grappling with a profound challenge: Do they revert to traditional exams or adapt to the surging influence of AI, particularly ChatGPT, which outperforms human students in many assessments?

Short Summary:

  • ChatGPT outperforms human students in university exams.
  • Universities consider transitioning back to traditional exam methods.
  • Experts advocate for a complete overhaul of assessment practices.

The University of Reading in the UK has spotlighted a pressing issue for higher education institutions: ChatGPT can not only pass university exams but often achieves higher grades than human students. This revelation forces universities worldwide into a crucial decision-making juncture. Should they stick with conventional exams, risking their relevance, or embrace new methods fit for an AI-dominated future?

ChatGPT’s Astonishing Performance

Researchers at the University of Reading undertook a study where ChatGPT was used to answer exam questions from various levels of psychology courses. The results were striking:

  • 94% of AI-generated answers went undetected by examiners.
  • AI consistently scored better than human students, except in third-year subjects requiring more abstract reasoning.

This has sparked a heated debate about the integrity of academic evaluations and the very essence of learning. As educators grapple with this dilemma, the conversation pivots on whether to retreat to traditional assessment methods or innovate.

Traditional vs. Modern Methods

Some universities have started reverting to invigilated in-person exams to mitigate the impact of AI. For instance, the University of Glasgow plans to transition its third and fourth-year Life Science exams back to in-person assessments to ensure the credibility of student grades. However, this raises a critical question: Are traditional exams preparing students for a world where AI is omnipresent?

A Call for Innovation

Many educators view this challenge as an opportunity to reform traditional assessment practices. Dr. Jennifer Chang Wathall from the University of Hong Kong argues,

“We need to focus on the process of learning and growth over a period of time; celebrating the strengths and talents of every individual. Assessment needs to be reframed as collecting evidence of student learning—a continuous process and measured against a set of qualitative criteria.”

This shift towards a more holistic evaluation acknowledges that in an AI-augmented world, the ability to creatively apply knowledge is more valuable than rote memorization.

Experimenting with New Approaches

Educators are exploring new assessment forms that emphasize real-world skills and are less prone to AI manipulation. Various alternative methods have been proposed:

  • Project-based assessments
  • Problem-solving scenarios
  • Oral presentations and debates
  • Reflective journals or portfolios
  • Experiential learning assignments
  • Collaborative group projects

These strategies cultivate critical thinking, creativity, and communication skills—competencies highly valued in the workplace and less replicable by AI.

AI in Writing and Learning

I recently witnessed an interesting element from the University of Nevada, where students in specific courses are directly competing against ChatGPT in writing assignments. According to Professor Leping Liu, this challenge isn’t about cheating but rather integrating AI to augment learning.

“ChatGPT comes out and everyone is using it, talking about it, whether or not we’d like them to. We have to deal with it, so we [wanted to] find a way to augment our teaching and learning and not just focus on cheating [concerns].”

This interaction not only boosts students’ understanding of AI’s capabilities and limitations but also shows improved student work when AI is used as a benchmark.

The Role of Human Skills

Despite the impressive performance of AI, its emergence might actually emphasize the importance of uniquely human skills. Trey Conatser from the University of Kentucky articulates this well:

“Findings like these can feel threatening, but they’re a provocation to reflect on how writing functions as a way of assessing learning as well as the act of learning itself.”

This viewpoint underscores the unique human experience of learning—marked by struggles, breakthroughs, and growth—something machines cannot replicate.

Changing the Way We Teach

The rise of AI tools like ChatGPT signifies the need for universities to rethink their teaching and assessment approaches. The traditional one-way lecture model is giving way to more interactive and engaging methods. As technology evolves, a new generation of tech-savvy learners demands innovative educational practices.

Many institutions now emphasize digital literacy, teaching students not only to use new technologies but to critically assess and integrate them into their learning process. This shift requires substantial investment in faculty training and curriculum redesign.

AI as a Learning Partner

Embracing AI in the curriculum means leveraging technology to enhance both teaching and learning experiences. From using AI to draft course rubrics to integrating AI tools like to streamline academic writing, the possibilities are vast.

For example, FeedbackFruits’ Automated Feedback tool aids in offering real-time, constructive feedback on lower-order writing skills, freeing up instructors to focus on higher-order feedback. This not only scales up the teaching process but enables students to submit improved work.

ChatGPT and Academic Integrity

The advent of ChatGPT has also brought forward concerns about academic honesty. Educators are revising their approach to assessments—some reverting to hand-written exams and others adapting digital tools to include AI-specific guidelines. However, ensuring academic integrity in the face of such advanced AI remains a formidable challenge.

“Ultimately, I’d like to provide detailed feedback for every single assignment, but that’s unrealistic. Automated Feedback did something I couldn’t provide for students,” reflects Dr. Adam Cardilini from Deakin University.

The Road Ahead

The future of education isn’t about opposing AI but integrating it for a balanced approach. Universities that can innovate effectively will be at the forefront of shaping the leaders of tomorrow. Teaching ethical AI use, fostering critical thinking, and nurturing creativity are essential steps.

The educational landscape is unmistakably changing, and the race to define it is on. The stakes for students, educators, and society are incredibly high, but the opportunity for transformative change has never been more significant.

For more insights into the evolving field of AI and its implications in education, visit our Artificial Intelligence for Writing section.